Become a Columnist Microsoft Exchange Site Microsoft Support SiteMSDN Exchange Site

   

Subscribe to OutlookExchange
Anderson Patricio
Ann Mc Donough
Bob Spurzem
Brian Veal
Catherine Creary
Cherry Beado
Colin Janssen
Collins Timothy Mutesaria
Drew Nicholson
Fred Volking
Glen Scales
Goran Husman
Guy Thomas
Henrik Walther
Jason Sherry
Jayme Bowers
John Young
Joyce Tang
Justin Braun
Konstantin Zheludev
Kristina Waters
Kuang Zhang
Mahmoud Magdy
Martin Tuip
Michael Dong
Michele Deo
Mitch Tulloch
Nicolas Blank
Pavel Nagaev
Ragnar Harper
Ricardo Silva
Richard Wakeman
Russ Iuliano
Santhosh Hanumanthappa
Steve Bryant
Steve Craig
Todd Walker
Tracey J. Rosenblath
 
   

The problem with co-existence is the mail routing

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3

Long Term Requirements

So let’s dive into the requirements for just a minute. What is our goal in long-term co-existence? Hopefully, you listed mail-routing and directory updates as those items are clearly critical. Those of you who mentioned calendar and task compatibility should be prepared to start a development project to build an in-house connector. The Notes Connector and Calendar Connectors are awesome tools for migration purposes, but you don’t want to build a long-term dependency on these tools. I suggest you plan on using the lowest common dominator which is routing and directory updates. Focus on a fast migration and not on trying to make every feature work. To make everything work, put everyone on the same system

SMTP is a Simple Transport

Now we can get to the point. The connectors do a nice job of synchronizing the directories. The problem with the connectors is that they also configure the systems to use the connectors for message transport which is the root of the problem. Personally, I love SMTP as a message transport between two systems. For one, everyone supports it. Microsoft and Lotus (IBM) will be more than happy to try and troubleshoot your SMTP problems regardless of the systems you are connecting.

So we have one half of the puzzle completed, we know we want to use SMTP. Now what do we do about the directory? We have two issues here:

1)      We need to create an internal SMTP routing system that will support two internal systems.

2)      We need to get the names from one system into the other.

The first item is a little tricky, but definitely works. You will probably need to logically breakup your SMTP domain into OTHER.COMPANY.COM and EXCHANGE.COMPANY.COM. By doing this, your legacy email system can route mail to the Exchange system and visa-versa. You will probably need to make some DNS changes on your internal servers to control these settings. You will also need to make some changes in respect to your inbound mail. If you are using scanning software like Minesweeper, you can alter your routing table to direct some of the mail addresses to one domain and allow the default routes to continue to point to the largest community.

In other words, if a bulk of your users will be in Exchange, allow the scanning software to continue to send SMTP mail directly to the server. You can create an alias table on the scanning machine to handle the exceptions: jdoe@company.com routes to jdoe@other.company.com which goes to the old environment.

If you do not have a separate SMTP environment, you can let Exchange handle this for you as well. A custom recipient with a default address of other.company.com can be routed as long as the Exchange system does not think he is the only server for @company.com. There are several good articles in TechNet that can describe how to share an SMTP domain in Exchange. It is not that difficult.

See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q278/8/38.ASP

 

The problem with co-existence is the mail routing

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3

Disclaimer: Your use of the information contained in these pages is at your sole risk. All information on these pages is provided "as is", without any warranty, whether express or implied, of its accuracy, completeness, fitness for a particular purpose, title or non-infringement, and none of the third-party products or information mentioned in the work are authored, recommended, supported or guaranteed by Stephen Bryant or Pro Exchange. OutlookExchange.Com, Stephen Bryant and Pro Exchange shall not be liable for any damages you may sustain by using this information, whether direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Copyright Stephen Bryant 2008