Become a Columnist Microsoft Exchange Site Microsoft Support SiteMSDN Exchange Site

   

Subscribe to OutlookExchange
Anderson Patricio
Ann Mc Donough
Bob Spurzem
Brian Veal
Catherine Creary
Cherry Beado
Colin Janssen
Collins Timothy Mutesaria
Drew Nicholson
Fred Volking
Glen Scales
Goran Husman
Guy Thomas
Henrik Walther
Jason Sherry
Jayme Bowers
John Young
Joyce Tang
Justin Braun
Konstantin Zheludev
Kristina Waters
Kuang Zhang
Mahmoud Magdy
Martin Tuip
Michael Dong
Michele Deo
Mitch Tulloch
Nicolas Blank
Pavel Nagaev
Ragnar Harper
Ricardo Silva
Richard Wakeman
Russ Iuliano
Santhosh Hanumanthappa
Steve Bryant
Steve Craig
Todd Walker
Tracey J. Rosenblath
 
 

Exchange 2000 Webstore Strategies

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5

Database Placement

In our centralized database example, the initial server in each data center will support both Class C and class B applications. By restricting the database sizes and store sizes as depicted in the illustration in Figure 5, SLA recovery specifications can be guaranteed as long as you practice due diligence on spare equipment and server backup and restore procedures. If you want to allow 100 GB databases, just make sure you can meet your SLAs.

Clearly, the most elegant recovery solution is a “snapshot” utility within a SAN box. Several manufacturers have products that “stream” data within the SAN to provide nearly instant recovery. Unless you have one of these solutions, I doubt you could recover 100 GB in 4 hours. You need to plan for server failure and database corruption. Neither happen that often, but both do happen.

Figure 5: Sample Database Placement

The scenario in Figure 5 plans for a couple of fast DLT drives in library systems to handle the backup and recovery of the servers in the Data Center. We know we could back up (?) a 7 GB database in eight hours as well as roll back any transactions we pick up along the way. This becomes our agreed upon “comfort zone.”

We also have decided that four databases are a better balance than the five databases recommendation. Once you fill four storage groups or the need for a Class A application arises, more server equipment must be allocated.

Another important thing to remember is the number of disk arrays you will need to support your applications. Each storage group should have a dedicated drive for the database as well as the transaction logs.

Summary

Ultimately, it is up to you to determine where the application fits into the overall scheme of things. The two main points I want to emphasize are:

  • Your embrace and support of applications will help ensure their success.
  • Choose your databases and storage group configurations based on SLA requirements and not based on department, geography or magic eight-ball.

© Copyright ECMS, Inc., 2000

Exchange 2000 Webstore Strategies

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5

Disclaimer: Your use of the information contained in these pages is at your sole risk. All information on these pages is provided "as is", without any warranty, whether express or implied, of its accuracy, completeness, fitness for a particular purpose, title or non-infringement, and none of the third-party products or information mentioned in the work are authored, recommended, supported or guaranteed by Stephen Bryant or Pro Exchange. OutlookExchange.Com, Stephen Bryant and Pro Exchange shall not be liable for any damages you may sustain by using this information, whether direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Copyright Stephen Bryant 2008