Become a Columnist Microsoft Exchange Site Microsoft Support SiteMSDN Exchange Site

   

Subscribe to OutlookExchange
Anderson Patricio
Ann Mc Donough
Bob Spurzem
Brian Veal
Catherine Creary
Cherry Beado
Colin Janssen
Collins Timothy Mutesaria
Drew Nicholson
Fred Volking
Glen Scales
Goran Husman
Guy Thomas
Henrik Walther
Jason Sherry
Jayme Bowers
John Young
Joyce Tang
Justin Braun
Konstantin Zheludev
Kristina Waters
Kuang Zhang
Mahmoud Magdy
Martin Tuip
Michael Dong
Michele Deo
Mitch Tulloch
Nicolas Blank
Pavel Nagaev
Ragnar Harper
Ricardo Silva
Richard Wakeman
Russ Iuliano
Santhosh Hanumanthappa
Steve Bryant
Steve Craig
Todd Walker
Tracey J. Rosenblath
 
 

Exchange 2000 Webstore Strategies

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5

Application Categorization

Your results from the SLA worksheet determine how you will categorize the application. Figure 3 shows a sample categorization

Figure 3: Sample Application Categorization

The diagram in Figure 4 allows us to categorize the application from the standpoint of availability or level of service.

Database Placement

You may not realize this, but your current Exchange environment is actually offering application hosting options for the user community. By default, access to the existing Public Folder structure is already available. If these folders are on Exchange 2000, you are an ASP! So what service level are you currently providing to your user community on these folders? Several times in our sample application categorization (Figure 3) , we used the classification D for no guarantees. If this is true for your case, you might want to ask yourself if your user community knows this? If not, you might want to let them know.

It is common for departments to take this commodity folder tree and build a dependency on the data and access to the information. Based on a basic ASP model, you should be prepared to offer them an upgrade to a higher access level. Consider the information in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Categorizing by availability or level of service

Commodity Access to Basic Public Folder Access 50MB SLA Class D

Upgrade to Exchange 2000 Additional WebStore Access 250 MB SLA Class C

Upgrade to Exchange 2000 Advanced WebStore Access 7GB MB SLA Class B

Upgrade to Exchange 2000 Dedicated WebStore 7BG+ MB SLA Class A

Class C applications share databases on the web store. This is the first level to which you charge the department. Why? Because additional drive space and SLA costs money to support. The financial aspect is only to show that there is a difference between supported and non-supported as well as the burden of managing additional data.

The Class B Application allows more advanced web store utilities and is an isolated web store in a shared storage group. Class B applications that use Event Sinks or Content Indexing introduce more risks to the other applications and should be better isolated. Moreover, Class B applications can take advantage of deep-traversal because it runs on a separate Top Level Hierarchy (TLH)

The Class A Application is a dedicated server that can be configured as the application requires. There are no preset storage group or database templates. Consider this a totally isolated application either because of extreme risk, extremely high server processing or the need for Global, Timer or Protocol sinks. Crazy security requirements may also dictate the need for a separate server.

Exchange 2000 Webstore Strategies

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5

Disclaimer: Your use of the information contained in these pages is at your sole risk. All information on these pages is provided "as is", without any warranty, whether express or implied, of its accuracy, completeness, fitness for a particular purpose, title or non-infringement, and none of the third-party products or information mentioned in the work are authored, recommended, supported or guaranteed by Stephen Bryant or Pro Exchange. OutlookExchange.Com, Stephen Bryant and Pro Exchange shall not be liable for any damages you may sustain by using this information, whether direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Copyright Stephen Bryant 2008